October, 1983 SportsCar:
Sports Renault Progress: There is progress in two different areas in the
Sports Renault program. First of all the SCCA has received deposits for 172
cars. An SCCA spokesman said orders have been averaging approximately five per week.
The other area of progress is in the testing of the race cars. Two chassis exist at
present. The first is undergoing durability tests at an AMC test track near
Dearborn, Mich. Reports indicate this has gone smoothly with the exception of a
clutch problem that has been worked out and a fuel feed problem.
Chassis number two is undergoing torsional rigidity testing. Some areas of
flexibility have been identified and the chassis is undergoing a triangulation
redesign. An SCCA source who says the car has been 'way overdesigned says that
weight is being taken out of the car by the following methods: use of thinner fiberglass
body panels, use of thinner walled tubing in the cars space frame; and replacement
of the prototypes steel floor pan with a bonded aluminum pan riveted onto the
cars bottom.
BULLETIN #1
To: Sports Renault Purchasers
From: Nicholas W. Craw
Date: October 31, 1983
Congratulations on being one of the first to
order SCCA's new Sports Renault! We are delighted that the car has enjoyed a favorable
reception and that the efforts of so many people have been rewarded with exceptional
market acceptance.
-
We consider you to be important pioneers in this new concept and we will try and keep you
informed on a regular basis as we continue the car's development and as we approach
production and delivery. This bulletin is our first step in that regard.
Notwithstanding the car's enthusiastic reception,
there is yet a great deal to be done before we are satisfied with the final product. Just
to let you know some of the steps in that process:
(1) Testing. The Sports Renault will undergo at
least three exhaustive track testing sessions, initially near Detroit and then, as we run
out of weather, in the South, possibly California.
(2) Rules. We have already begun drafting a set
of rules as well as the all-important policing procedures. These will be shared with you
for comment as soon as they have gone through several iterations internally.
(3) Distribution and Assembly. We will be
soliciting proposals for the award of exclusive market territories; these
"dealers" will be required to provide assembly to customers at a fixed price and
to offer parts support at the races. We are presently putting together a bidders list and
criteria for selection and if you know of someone in your area whom you feel should be
considered, please suggest that they contact us.
(4) National Class. Given the level of interest
and the number of cars ordered, we anticipate that Sports Renault will be designated as a
National Class for 1984; however, this requires specific Board action and this will be an
agenda item for the November 18th meeting.
(5) Rebuilds. We are investigating several
options in providing a rebuild mechanism for competitors which will assure a good supply
of engines and quick turn-around service. As in the case of dealer/assemblers, please feel
free to make suggestions or to stimulate inquiries.
(6) Contingency Money. There will be generous
contingency funds attached to National races and to the Runoffs; the numbers are still
very much in the discussion stage but it is our intention that these be substantial and
enhance the income potential (and tax deductability) of the class.
(7) Professional Series. For long-range planning
purposes, we are also looking for a pro series in 1985, although this will have to wait
until 1984 when we can prove the product through the size and quality of the fields. Once
again, however, we already have available sources of funding and it is only a question of
amounts and of structuring the series itself.
(8) Production. It is clear that we need to make
a maximum effort to deliver cars in the April/May/June window in order to enhance our
competitors' chances of qualifying for the Runoffs; the delivery dates which we quoted at
the CSPRRC are our minimum expected performance and we will shoot for delivery at faster
and earlier dates.
(9) Wild Speculation Department. We are
negotiating the possibility of an IROC-type race as a prelim to the Detroit GP, pitting
six F-l drivers against six SCCA chauffeurs. While the concept is exciting and would
surely give the new class a major launch, there are understandably a great many details
yet to be worked out.
If you have questions that are not covered in
this bulletin, please contact Bill King here in this office.
We will keep you posted as we continue to develop
the car. Our thanks again to you for the confidence you have shown in this concept.
Nicholas W. Craw, President
BULLETIN #2
To: Sports Renault Purchasers
From: Bill King
Date: December 6, 1983
To date we have received down payments on 172 Sports Renault racers. In addition, there
have been 52 individuals and/or companies that have expressed serious interest in becoming
distributors. We are handling around a dozen inquiries a day from people requesting order
forms. There follows a run down of developments over the last month:
(1) Testing. The meticulous testing and
development process necessary to turn the prototype we unveiled at Road Atlanta into a
bona-fide production race car is now fully underway with engineers from both Renault
Jeep/Sport and SCCA in almost daily communication.
The prototype is undergoing component durability
testing at an AMC facility near Detroit. A clutch hydraulic problem was solved during
initial testing, and engineers are working on a cutting out problem that crops up in left
hand turns.
A second chassis has undergone testing for
torsional rigidity and several problem areas were identified. Using the results of these
tests, the observations of the SCCA project engineers, and valuable input from SCCA racers
who studied the chassis at the Run-Offs, a third chassis is now under construction.
The third chassis will be ready for a series of
extensive race track tests the middle of January and will incorporate the following design
refinements: significant weight reduction through selective use of thinner walled tubing
and replacement of the steel floor pan with a bonded and riveted aluminum panel;
introduction of a scattershield/bulkhead behind the drivers compartment;
relocation of the steering column to facilitate left foot braking; and much greater
torsional strength through improved triangulation.
Every effort is being made to insure that what
hits the track next season is a good race car. Well document the track test program
for you and also garner some driving impressions from a couple of racers whose opinion we
all respect.
(2) Rules. As much as wed like to
say differently, the sealed engine concept does not appear to be an
economically feasible alternative. For a sealed engine program to work, engines are going
to have to be readily available at the track, and competitors would be responsible for the
freight bills incurred shipping engines to a central repair shop. Round trip engine
freight bills over any distance are roughly $200 plus. For the competitor in need of a
valve job or with a minor problem such as a blown head gasket, that seems an unreasonable
expense.
Experience with stock engines suggests that the
most frequent engine problems will involve the head. We are considering a core
head exchange program with one central shop doing all of the head prep work and
checking for legality. Shipping costs for a head are more on the order of $50 to $75 round
trip.
Pursuing the next logical step, we have ordered
an engine from Renault which we are going to use to develop engine maintenance guidelines
making full use our knowledge of the engine preparation pitfalls previously encountered in
Showroom Stock, Formula Vee, and Formula Ford. We intend to forcefully retain the concept
of a stock engine. We also still intend to give race officials the option of requiring a
competitor to exchange engines in cases where cheating is suspected, and we anticipate
severe penalties for transgressors.
There are obviously a thousand and one details
that were still working on, but this gives you an idea of the direction we are
headed. We would appreciate your input.
(3) 1984 Sports Renault National
Champion. We are considering a scheme for determining a national champion next year
whereby all Sports Renault owners are invited to Road Atlanta the Saturday prior to the
RunOffs week to participate in a Sports Renault Qualifying Day. We will either
have a national championship race that day, or choose 42 drivers through a series of
qualifying sessions and heat races to compete in the CSPRRC program the following week. In
other words, racers with late delivery dates will still get a shot at the national title.
(4) Sourcing. Renault Jeep/Sport is
handling all sourcing with regards construction of the basic car. SCCA will be sourcing
spark plugs, motor oil and lubricants, tires, and batteries.
(5) Car Bodies. Since buyers will
be painting their own cars, we have decided that due to potential paint-to-primer
compatibility problems, car bodies will be shipped in rough white gel coat rather than
primer as was originally advertised.
(6) Feedback. We will from time to time
request feedback on certain steps or procedures we are contemplating. Please, write. A
phone call can be a waste of time and money. You talk to only one person who may or may
not accurately record your observations. A brief note or letter makes your point the way
you want it made and, when photo-copied, allows your input to be accurately disseminated
to all interested parties.
Miscellany from 1983
Prototype Sports Renault shown at the Runoffs...111 racers put down $500 deposits in 3
days.
Car Designed and built by: Renault/Jeep Sport (RJS), Livonia, Michigan
Renault/Jeep Sport Racing Manager: Vic Elford
Chassis/Body Designer: Roy Lunn (and President of RJS)
The Preliminary Name of the Car: Sports 1000
Test Driving of Prototype: Dave Weitzenhof |